Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

September 23 2017

6028 1434 500

jordanparrished:

So somebody on my Facebook posted this. And I’ve seen sooooo many memes like it. Images of a canvas with nothing but a slash cut into it, or a giant blurry square of color, or a black circle on a white canvas. There are always hundreds of comments about how anyone could do that and it isn’t really art, or stories of the time someone dropped a glove on the floor of a museum and people started discussing the meaning of the piece, assuming it was an abstract found-objects type of sculpture.

The painting on the left is a bay or lake or harbor with mountains in the background and some people going about their day in the foreground. It’s very pretty and it is skillfully painted. It’s a nice piece of art. It’s also just a landscape. I don’t recognize a signature style, the subject matter is far too common to narrow it down. I have no idea who painted that image.

The painting on the right I recognized immediately. When I was studying abstraction and non-representational art, I didn’t study this painter in depth, but I remember the day we learned about him and specifically about this series of paintings. His name was Ad Reinhart, and this is one painting from a series he called the ultimate paintings. (Not ultimate as in the best, but ultimate as in last.)

The day that my art history teacher showed us Ad Reinhart’s paintings, one guy in the class scoffed and made a comment that it was a scam, that Reinhart had slapped some black paint on the canvas and pretentious people who wanted to look smart gave him money for it. My teacher shut him down immediately. She told him that this is not a canvas that someone just painted black. It isn’t easy to tell from this photo, but there are groups of color, usually squares of very very very dark blue or red or green or brown. They are so dark that, if you saw them on their own, you would call each of them black. But when they are side by side their differences are apparent. Initially you stare at the piece thinking that THAT corner of the canvas is TRUE black. Then you begin to wonder if it is a deep green that only appears black because the area next to it is a deep, deep red. Or perhaps the “blue” is the true black and that red is actually brown. Or perhaps the blue is violet and the color next to it is the true black. The piece challenges the viewer’s perception. By the time you move on to the next painting, you’re left to wonder if maybe there have been other instances in which you believe something to be true but your perception is warped by some outside factor. And then you wonder if ANY of the colors were truly black. How can anything be cut and dry, black and white, when even black itself isn’t as absolute as you thought it was?

People need to understand that not all art is about portraying a realistic image, and that technical skills (like the ability to paint a scene that looks as though it may have been photographed) are not the only kind of artistic skills. Some art is meant to be pretty or look like something. Other art is meant to carry a message or an idea, to provoke thought.

Reinhart’s art is utterly genius.

“But anyone could have done that! It doesn’t take any special skill! I could have done that!”

Ok. Maybe you could have. But you didn’t.

Give abstract art some respect. It’s more important than you realize.

Reposted fromziyoxis ziyoxis viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
5789 e414

desemba:

sleepyhead

Amaya-chan
0760 bfe0 500
Reposted fromginnyvere ginnyvere viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
2076 b674
Reposted frommistic mistic viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
7739 c9f4
Reposted fromVegelus Vegelus viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
6410 a709
Reposted fromoll oll viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
8438 2c6b
Amaya-chan
6379 0f41
Amaya-chan
4009 8405
Amaya-chan
5327 7b19
Reposted fromdebsy91 debsy91 viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
9694 dcba
Amaya-chan
8031 c335
Tea calendar.
Reposted fromelentarie elentarie viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
5323 1efa

I wanna go there

Reposted frommyry myry viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
3326 3c08 500

femmenace-t:

pervocracy:

postwhitesociety:

hm

I think the “women are mysterious” thing can also come from:

1) Women actually being quite clear, but not telling men what they want to hear.  ”She said she doesn’t want to talk to me?  So many mixed messages and confusing signals!”

2) Women not having cheat codes.  ”I tried being nice, and she didn’t have sex with me.  I tried being an asshole, and she didn’t have sex with me.  Come on, there’s got to be some kind of solution to this puzzle!”

3) Women not being a hive mind.  ”First a woman told me that she likes guys with big muscles.  Then the very next day a woman told me she thinks muscles aren’t attractive at all.  Make up your mind, women!”

4) An individual woman doing something confusing, and instead of asking “why is she doing this now?” men ask “why do women always do this?”

Always reblog

Reposted fromAnyawen Anyawen viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
9638 fdae 500
Reposted fromoll oll viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
Reposted fromFlau Flau viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Amaya-chan
4038 9b3c
Reposted fromTARDIS TARDIS viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
3860 6c23 500

smallestofinfinities:

my friend showed me her “everyday japanese” book and this page was titled “self-pity and regret”

the japanese think of everything

Reposted fromtygrysica tygrysica viazakonasasynow zakonasasynow
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl